| Constant Quality | ||
| Date Added: | 17th March, 2009 | |
| Type: | Recip | |
| Category: | general | |
| URL: | http://www.constantquality.net | |
| Deep Links? | no | |
| Pagerank & Rating Info | ||
| Average Weekly Points: | 1.55 (Position #67 on the list) | PR0 |
| Total Points: | 81 | |
| Number of Ratings: | 14 | |
| Average Rating Score: | 57/80 | |
| Directory Description & Resource Links | |
| Constant Quality is a human edited, SEO web directory. Each and every submission is carefully reviewed for quality, thus the name 'Constant Quality'. Constant Quality also guarantees acceptance in under 24 Hours. |
Resource Links: Resource links are only for premium listings. Click the button below to learn more about premium listings: |
| Rating by urimages on 16th April, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By urimages, 60/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: Good directory. Very fast approval. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | |||
| Value For Money: | |||
| Return Traffic: | 2/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 9/10 | ||
| Rating by Jan Appleton on 14th April, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Jan Appleton, 46/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: No comments were made. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | N/A | ||
| Value For Money: | N/A | ||
| Return Traffic: | 0/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 6/10 | ||
| Rating by Michael Mayo on 10th April, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Michael Mayo, 52/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: No comments were made. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | |||
| Value For Money: | N/A | ||
| Return Traffic: | 0/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 9/10 | ||
| Rating by Graeme Robertson on 3rd April, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Graeme Robertson, 48/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: No comments were made. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | |||
| Value For Money: | N/A | ||
| Return Traffic: | 0/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 7/10 | ||
| Rating by deepesh das on 29th March, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By deepesh das, 68/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: The directory maintains norms which is most important for a quality directory. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | |||
| Value For Money: | |||
| Return Traffic: | 2/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 10/10 | ||
| Rating by Sanjiv Sharma on 27th March, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Sanjiv Sharma, 70/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: Excellent directory with lots of categories to choose from. The directory has a fast approval process and the editing team is excellent. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | |||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | |||
| Value For Money: | |||
| Return Traffic: | 0/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 10/10 | ||
| Rating by Mark on 24th March, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Mark, 59/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: Good directory. The strong point of this directory is the review time. Faster than any other free directory. My link was reviewed and accepted in 4 hours. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | |||
| Value For Money: | |||
| Return Traffic: | 2/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 9/10 | ||
| Rating by Ian Perry on 24th March, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Ian Perry, 56/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: No comments were made. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | N/A | ||
| Value For Money: | N/A | ||
| Return Traffic: | 0/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 10/10 | ||
| Rating by Jennie McClain on 23rd March, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Jennie McClain, 61/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: Great directory, excellent communication and fast approval. I definitely recommend them to everyone. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | |||
| Value For Money: | N/A | ||
| Return Traffic: | 0/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 10/10 | ||
| Rating by Bill Myers on 23rd March, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Bill Myers, 66/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: Excellent Directory. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | |||
| Value For Money: | |||
| Return Traffic: | 2/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 10/10 | ||
| Rating by Rich on 23rd March, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Rich, 49/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: Appears to be making a genuine effort to grow this directory. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | |||
| Value For Money: | N/A | ||
| Return Traffic: | 0/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 6/10 | ||
| Rating by Matt Chatterley on 23rd March, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Matt Chatterley, 52/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: No comments were made. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | |||
| Value For Money: | N/A | ||
| Return Traffic: | 0/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 9/10 | ||
| Rating by Jorge R Rocha on 20th March, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Jorge R Rocha, 63/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: Keep the good work. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | |||
| Value For Money: | N/A | ||
| Return Traffic: | 4/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 9/10 | ||
| Rating by Jack Hopper on 19th March, 2009 | |||
|
Rated By Jack Hopper, 47/80 |
Individual Scores: |
Comments: The Experience was Good. Recommended?
|
|
| Site Design: | |||
| Extra Features: | |||
| Listings Per Page: | |||
| Number of Categories: | |||
| Link/Advertising Options: | |||
| Submission Time (free): | |||
| Submission Time (paid): | N/A | ||
| Submission Process: | |||
| Directory Staff: | N/A | ||
| Value For Money: | N/A | ||
| Return Traffic: | 2/10 | ||
| Overall Score: | 6/10 | ||