|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 125
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Has anyone tried out tnx.net yet? I am going to setup a site especially to do a test with them. Check out the site anyway, I like the concept. It has it's flaws but overall it looks like a pretty easy and cheap way to get bulk links. Not going to solve everyones problems, but it's another cog in the chain
![]()
__________________
Professional Directory Submission Service |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 11
![]() |
Agree with Megrisoft. The quality of a backlink is much, much more important than the quantity. Those guys offer quantity and I doubt there is much quality in that. Sometimes with only 100 strong and relevant backlinks you can rock the serps - don't need to have 100,000 unrelated...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 147
![]() |
Whether you debate quality/quantity for ranking is only one side of the argument. The other half of the issue is that quality links will last forever -- meaning people see your link on quality sites, they think you are quality, and link to you from their site.
Quantity, though, and you're just on some junk site. Nobody values you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 46
![]() |
Quote:
Thanks, Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
![]() |
I have used them but have gone just for extra small amounts of text and not just for my main keywords but for some of those that are not so well known. To be honest, i am quite happy with the service and performance although I agree that their UI needs a lot of work as I still dont really understand it.
![]()
__________________
London Tours |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|